Have you looked at the Contents Page? You'll find Oban, or more accurately Ganavan, covered in some detail - we couldn't resist  If you fire TAT-1 into the search, you'll find we're on the case for that too, only listed as a First at the moment, we're hunting down more info on the subject. Wikipedia information is second-hand, not source material, so you won't normally find it referred to in SeSco, which doesn't mind admitting it's the same (second-hand info) as there's no shame in that. What would be wrong is being second-hand source referring or quoting a second-hand source - which I hope makes sense  |